Skip to main content

Plan your whole week in seconds

Try it free
CookChook
Nutrition Comparison

Salmon (Atlantic) vs Canned Tuna (in water)

Side-by-side nutrition face-off — all values per 100 grams

Calories

208 kcalvs109 kcal
Canned Tuna (in water) wins

Protein

20gvs25.5g
Canned Tuna (in water) wins

Fat

13gvs0.8g
Canned Tuna (in water) wins
Salmon (Atlantic)Canned Tuna (in water)
208 kcalCalories109 kcal
20gProtein25.5g
0gCarbs0g
13gFat0.8g
0gFiber0g
59mgSodium337mg
NutrientSalmon (Atlantic)Canned Tuna (in water)Winner
Calories208kcal109kcalCanned Tuna (in water)
Protein20g25.5gCanned Tuna (in water)
Carbs0g0g
Fat13g0.8gCanned Tuna (in water)
Fiber0g0g
Sodium59mg337mgSalmon (Atlantic)

Popular Food Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has more calories, Salmon (Atlantic) or Canned Tuna (in water)?

Salmon (Atlantic) has 208 kcal per 100g while Canned Tuna (in water) has 109 kcal per 100g. Canned Tuna (in water) is lower in calories by 99 kcal.

Which has more protein, Salmon (Atlantic) or Canned Tuna (in water)?

Salmon (Atlantic) has 20g of protein per 100g while Canned Tuna (in water) has 25.5g. Canned Tuna (in water) is higher in protein.

Is Salmon (Atlantic) healthier than Canned Tuna (in water)?

It depends on your goals. Salmon (Atlantic) has 208 kcal, 20g protein, and 13g fat per 100g, while Canned Tuna (in water) has 109 kcal, 25.5g protein, and 0.8g fat. Choose based on whether you're optimizing for protein, calories, or overall macros.

Salmon (Atlantic) vs Canned Tuna (in water): Calories & Nutrition Compared [2026]